Letter to the Polity - Underground News

When does a problem become listed as a threat to National Security?

My problem is not a series of isolated incidents, and a rudimentary google search will show that there is a wealth of information concerning the monopoly router/modem that is so easily hacked (thereby cutting communications, for those of us using v.o.i.p.).

Although my mode of communications (phone) is hit-and-miss, this is only one issue of complaint.

When there's only one choice for Internet Communications Providers, and any potential competition is now unlawful under the new laws imposed, this seems to be a critical National Security issue. At very least, other Nations know to take down one or two Internet monopolies affects all of America's Internet communications, for instance.

Having left our only other choice of Internet Providers in our area of Springfield Ohio (Time Warner a.k.a. Spectrum), that was left due to being hacked by those we trust for Internet:

Three agents were recorded, so nobody has to take my word; see the proof of damaging property here:

http://162.207.30.13:8080/spectrum/index.html

Illegal blacklisting and other problems caused by the monopolies here:

http://162.207.30.13:8080/time-warner/index.html

I then went to ATT which offered slower internet for higher cost.

However, I was primarily concerned about security and not speed since I have a server that only friends and family infrequently visit anyway.

At&T state I cannot use my own modems and force us to take their modem which is incorporated with a router all-in-one.

I've documented rather thoroughly how easily the monopoly modem / router is hacked and even posted videos to show and tell (which can be found on YouTube, Daily Motion, as well as my own server).

Now imagine a Nuclear disaster. Does our missiles and Nuclear Power Plants not run on computer?

What is obviously apparent to me is that when we speak out against any wrong-doing or mis-givings by the Internet Providers, we are simply squelched by the weakest link, our limited Internet Connections availed by those two (basically, nationwide) Providers?

For instance, my Internet line sits spliced from a cut due to the monopoly not placing the line in the designated (Right of Way and/or Eminent Domain) and therefor has remained spliced with tape holding the connection together. The problem is that it's rainy season and now that line is under water offering a sketchy connection at best. Why am I still being lawfully charged the same amount for this? What is the definition of Profiteering?

And in closing, how is it that monopoly control is so unfair? Why is it that although the Public must pay dearly for their Internet, that there is no recompense for the failure to do so?

If we went to the store and bought 4 apples for $1.00 and are only given 2, is this not an Enron-type scam?

If anything contained herein is important, copy it before it's removed entirely from the Internet. It's what they do to manipulate public awareness and opinion.

Fair Use Clause

107: Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. Title I, 101, Oct 19, 1976, 90 Stat 2546)

American Underground News you never knew existed

https://forums.att.com/t5/AT-T-Internet-Equipment/Router-Hacked/td-p/5293413

https://forums.att.com/t5/AT-T-Internet-Equipment/Help-I-think-my-ATT-router-has-been-hacked/td-p/5599174

https://forums.att.com/t5/AT-T-Internet-Equipment/Hacked-Router/td-p/5704923

https://forums.att.com/t5/AT-T-Internet-Equipment/ROUTER-HACKED/td-p/5043758

https://www.zdnet.com/article/flaws-in-att-routers-put-customers-at-risk/

http://162.207.30.13:8080/ohiopostunderground/att-debacle/index.html